If a child comes forward and says a member of the family molested her, is her testimony enough to convict? - train molest
His psyche eval said she told the truth. Your physical health showed evidence of possible sexual abuse.
What is strange is the thief has the lie detector, the evidence of more mad than ever is passed, because trained technicians to be looking for evidence of "manipulation". He was home now.
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Train Molest If A Child Comes Forward And Says A Member Of The Family Molested Her, Is Her Testimony Enough To Convict?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
22 comments:
Usually, the victim's statement is not enough to condemn. You will need: proof of medical evidence and physical evidence. You will need: the testimony of witnesses. You will need: a psychological examination of the victim and the aggressor. To name a few. Probably the exceptions to the above, but very, very rare.
To call It's a tough one ... Some children are too young to give to reliable information, and add them to care or poor worker inadvertently requested that the child is found in food and offer it back to the consultant. Bad for adults who have nothing then maybe change a wet diaper or something completely innocent. Similarly, an angry teenager or pre teen can make false accusations, simply by malice.
Moreover, there are sociopaths who easily beat the lie detector as they can convince themselves that did not, done, or otherwise. If they convince themselves after that, you can trick the machine ..
Like I said .. a difficult choice as the first form of innocent people their lives completely ruined forever .. and in the second example of a predator is always there.
Since all the cards on the table to make sure eveyone is aware that the ice is thin for all involved. Someone has lied, and that means of course that needs to go both a fixed line. Sorry for the innocence, but you have to Ex --Of course, too. More ... It provides a way to minimize the other or both to keep the contact.
Good luck, I know not envy you your situation ...
.
Do not think the house is free. The testimony of the child probably will not be enough to convict, and a lie detector is not sufficient to establish clearly the innocent. Much will be acquired for the jurors, or the history and the opinion of the judges too much play. If the child is not very convincing that the person accused of betting and the possibility exists that the wrong way, too. Children are sometimes confused. If he is truly innocent, the conviction is obtained, which means that the offender still does not do it. No justice is done and an innocent man rot without giving reasons. If he is guilty, and is basically the same. I want a word to children and young people to a lie detector. It is a very slippery slope here.
I think both parties can find more evidence. I would not be alone on either side bets with this information.
I saw innocent men convicted and looks a lot less guilty about walking more.
The judicial system just sucks.It is well made primarily for the written and as "Just Us" in this case.
I know a case in which a man has a child to have sex with her. "He did it three times in 10 minutes." agree with her. received a physical examination, and after the nurse that the hymen was intact, but it can be "pushed".
This poor man has been arrested, spent a month in prison before being acquitted on all counts. DA does not matter if there is a strong example or not.
I guarantee you that this man, guilty or innocent, is finally arrested and charged.
I had a husband whose wife once accused him of sexually abusing children. again, the psychologist said, "might do". I'm 99.99999% sure that he did not. But cracks showed the physical sense, "possible", but it could have many other causes. do not tell the age of the child, adults only, the search for a child, something that typically make up a child, so you could say. There are millions of reasons why children can say that if it is not. like in the case of my ex and his mother was. that's what meant his mother and psych. Children want to please. You will probably never be what really happened.
I had a husband whose wife once accused him of sexually abusing children. again, the psychologist said, "might do". I'm 99.99999% sure that he did not. But cracks showed the physical sense, "possible", but it could have many other causes. do not tell the age of the child, adults only, the search for a child, something that typically make up a child, so you could say. There are millions of reasons why children can say that if it is not. like in the case of my ex and his mother was. that's what meant his mother and psych. Children want to please. You will probably never be what really happened.
A polygraph is not throwing much better than a coin. Measure your stress and if someone good liar, for lies are not by what might happen if someone is innocent, says, this emphasizes the situation and the failure.
Whether the word is small enough for young girls is a difficult question. If you do not have the DNA to be difficult, based on their word against his conviction.
It can, but someone needs to fully investigate the whereabouts and other claims and evidence.
Be fully protected in any case, the child needs. Victim Services should be used immediately, or it can have serious psychological life.
No one expects that several polygraph. These are just a tool. Probably so.
Because it is more than just the testimony of your support, I would say yes. Polygraph testing is generally not admissible in court because they are not a correct. People who are cold and not influenced by pressure, that most offenders, because they can feel superior, you will just spend like a lie detector. Agitation and small movements of the examinee can produce different results.
The research will be done after the child is made a complaint of sexual abuse, which sentenced the person. Polygraph tests are not admissible in court, it is not necessary. And sociopaths, the type of person that a child that you can pass polygraphs can harass with no problem.
The research will be done after the child is made a complaint of sexual abuse, which sentenced the person. Polygraph tests are not admissible in court, it is not necessary. And sociopaths, the type of person that a child that you can pass polygraphs can harass with no problem.
A certificate for a child before a court as sexual abuse .. Truck to the yard / / .. Members of the jury to convict the culprit .. I worked in several cases of sexual abuse .. Testimony of the child has won both cases. .
Ultimately, it may be sufficient. Perhaps if she is very young, since children under 6 years. But you never know until the trial.
Polygraph is not admissible in court - because they are completely wrong.
Not usually, but not without further evidence. It depends on what the evidence "may" also.
Not usually, but not without further evidence. It depends on what the evidence "may" also.
probably could be a psychological problem, making him believe that he is innocent. to answer your question, their words are not enough
With a good tax itself
It appears that you have your answer, it would not be welcome in my house, anyway.
It appears that you have your answer, it would not be welcome in my house, anyway.
It appears that you have your answer, it would not be welcome in my house, anyway.
It appears that you have your answer, it would not be welcome in my house, anyway.
It appears that you have your answer, it would not be welcome in my house, anyway.
Post a Comment